3745-4-04 Level 1 data requirements and reporting.

(A) Except as provided by paragraph (D) of rule 3745-4-01 of the Administrative Code, all data submitted to the director for consideration as level 1 credible data shall be collected and submitted by level 1, level 2 or level 3 qualified data collectors(QDCs) approved by the director pursuant to rule 3745-4-03 of the Administrative Code. The director shall accept the data as level 1 credible data provided the requirements of this rule are met. The director shall have sole authority in determining whether data meet these requirements. Data reporting shall be in a format consistent with the requirements listed in this rule. Data submitted by a QDC determined to meet these requirements shall be included in a computerized database maintained by Ohio EPA and made available for sharing with other agencies and interested persons.

(B) Data submitted by a QDC must meet the requirements in this paragraph to be accepted as level 1 credible data.

(1) Adherence to a study plan. Persons submitting data to Ohio EPA as a QDC under section 6111.53 of the Revised Code must prepare and adhere to a project study plan or, alternatively, use a generic study plan as described in this paragraph.

(a) The QDC shall prepare and submit to the director for approval a project study plan using educational monitoring program guidance materials, volunteer monitoring program guidance materials, or other valid resources. Upon completion of the plan review, the director shall send written notification of deficiencies in the plan, if any are found, to the QDC and provide the QDC a reasonable opportunity to address such deficiencies. If the deficiencies are not addressed, the director may disapprove the study plan. A plan submitted by a QDC not disapproved within sixty days of the initial submittal or, where a notification of deficiency has been issued, within sixty days of any revised submittal, shall be considered to have been approved. The director will disapprove a site-specific plan that does not include the certification statement in paragraph (B)(3)(c) of this rule.

(b) Generic study plan. The director may from time to time make available generic study plans suitable for certain project objectives and utilizing appropriate methods. After such time that a generic study plan is available, the QDC may elect to collect data using the generic study plan. The QDC is encouraged to send written notification to the director of the QDC's intent to follow the generic study plan. The director may ask the QDC to supply additional pertinent project specific information on a form provided by Ohio EPA. However, the QDC may submit credible data to the director in accordance with a generic study plan without prior notification or approval from the director.

(2) Use of appropriate test methods. In preparing the project study plan, the QDC shall be responsible for selecting the appropriate field and laboratory methods, including quality assurance/quality control steps, that fit the objectives and purpose of the data collection project. All methods should be commensurate with the purposes of level 1 and the need for sufficient rigor and sensitivity to detect relatively large differences in water quality over time or from sampling site to sampling site. The QDC may select from parameters and test methods published by the director pursuant to paragraph (C) of this rule or similar parameters and test methods recommended by an educational or volunteer monitoring program or reported in the scientific literature.

(3) Data reporting. QDCs choosing to submit their data to Ohio EPA must submit all collected data. Submission of data may be done at any time, but must be done no later than one year after completion of the study identified in the project study plan. For ongoing sampling programs, data submission should begin no later than one year after the initial phase of study identified in the project study plan. The following shall be submitted:

(a) Level 1 sample date using the online credible data database;

(b) A certification that, to the best of the QDC's knowledge and belief, the data were collected in accordance with the procedures required by the approved project study plan, generic study plan, or generic plan component; and

(c) A signed statement from each QDC working on the project certifying that the QDC has not been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of section 2911.21 of the Revised Code (criminal trespass) or a substantially similar municipal ordinance within the previous five years.

(4) Data approval process. The director shall review data submissions to verify that they were submitted by a QDC, that appropriate test methods and quality control/quality assurance practices were used, and that the data reporting requirements are complete. The review will ensure that all components of the plan for the collection of data were followed. If substantial discrepancies are found, the director may decide not to approve the data. The director will provide written notification to the person submitting the data as to whether the data have been approved as level 1 credible data.

(C) Publication of appropriate test methods.

The director from time to time shall publish examples of appropriate level 1 test methods for commonly sampled parameters. Appendix A of this rule is the published list of such examples as of the effective date of this rule.

Click to view Appendix

Effective: 07/29/2011
R.C. 119.032 review dates: 04/19/2011 and 07/29/2016
Promulgated Under: 119.03
Statutory Authority: 6111.51
Rule Amplifies: 6111.50 , 6111.51 , 6111.52 , 6111.53 , 6111.54 , 6111.55 , 6111.56
Prior Effective Dates: 3/26/2006