Skip to main content
This website publishes administrative rules on their effective dates, as designated by the adopting state agencies, colleges, and universities.

Chapter 5501:2-3 | Bidding and Contracting

 
 
 
Rule
Rule 5501:2-3-02 | Application for qualification.
 

(A) The application for qualification shall be made on a form entitled "qualification application" hereinafter referred to as the application. The applicant shall file all supporting data required by the application.

(B) All contractors who request to become qualified with the department to perform contract work, both prime and subcontract, in the amount not to exceed an aggregate of five million dollars yearly shall have a review performed on the contractor's financial statements and complete the application as required. Such review shall be performed by an independent certified public accountant. The five million dollars or less amount includes all uncompleted work for both department and non-department work inclusive of the bid amount. The following is required in order to have the application processed:

(1) The financial statement included in the application shall be furnished by the applicant and reviewed by an independent certified public accountant. The term "independent" as applied to a certified public accountant shall have the meaning generally understood and accepted in standard accounting practice. The independent certified public accountant must perform the review of the financial statements in accordance with statements on standards for accounting and review services issued by the american institute of certified public accountants and issue a review report thereon.

(2) The issuance of the review report shall constitute certification that a review in accordance with such standards has been performed and reported.

(C) All contractors who request to become qualified with the department to perform contract work, both prime and subcontract, in an amount that is greater than an aggregate of five million dollars yearly shall have an audit performed on the contractor's financial statements and complete the application as required. Such audit shall be performed by an independent certified public accountant. The five million dollars or more amount includes all uncompleted work for both department and non-department work inclusive of the bid amount. The following is required in order to have the application processed:

(1) The financial statement included in the application shall be furnished by the applicant and audited by an independent certified public accountant. The term "independent" as applied to a certified public accountant shall have the meaning generally understood and accepted in standard accounting practice. The independent certified public accountant must perform the audit of the financial statements in accordance with the standards as prescribed by generally accepted auditing standards and issue an audit opinion thereon.

(2) The issuance of the audit opinion shall constitute certification that an audit in accordance with such standards has been performed and reported.

Last updated March 24, 2023 at 12:59 PM

Supplemental Information

Authorized By: 5525.05
Amplifies: 5525.01, 5525.02, 5525.03, 5525.04, 5525.05, 5525.06, 5525.07, 5525.08, 5525.09
Five Year Review Date: 4/6/2026
Prior Effective Dates: 1/1/1998
Rule 5501:2-3-03 | Responsibility and competency.
 

The director shall determine an applicant's responsibility and competency by first computing the applicant's net assets in accordance with rule 5501:2-3-01 of the Administrative Code. Next, the director shall grant the applicant types of work for which the applicant is responsible and competent in accordance with rule 5501:2-3-04 of the Administrative Code. Finally, the net assets will be multiplied by a factor between one and ten with ten being the maximum rating, with the resultant total representing the dollar bidding capacity or bidder's qualification amount. The multiplying factor the applicant receives will be determined by averaging the total scores received in the previous calendar year from its evaluations. If the applicant has not completed work for the department, the applicant will receive the maximum rating of eight. If the applicant has performed work for the department, but not in the previous calendar year, the applicant will receive its most recent rating. Each contractor will receive an evaluation for each project for which it has performed work. In the event it is a multiple year project, an evaluation will be completed yearly.

Supplemental Information

Authorized By: 119.03, 5525.05
Amplifies: 5525.01, 5525.02, 5525.03, 5525.04, 5525.05, 5525.06, 5525.07, 5525.08, 5525.09
Five Year Review Date: 2/5/2026
Prior Effective Dates: 7/1/2002
Rule 5501:2-3-05 | Certificate of qualification.
 

A certificate of qualification shall be valid for one year or less, unless revoked by the director in accordance with sections 5525.03 and 5525.07 of the Revised Code and the rules promulgated pursuant thereto, provided that the applicant's financial statement is not more than one year and five months beyond the last day of an applicant's fiscal year.

The certificate shall set out the bidder's dollar bidding capacity and the work types for which the bidder is qualified on the basis of its submitted financial documents, previous performance for the department and general work experience. The bidder may only bid on contracts for which it has dollar bidding capacity for one hundred per cent of its bid at the time of submittal. The dollar amount of all pending work shall be subtracted from the bidder's dollar bidding capacity at the time of bidding by the department to determine whether the bidder has dollar bidding capacity at least equal to one hundred per cent of its bid.

A bidder must possess work types, and perform work, equal to at least fifty per cent of the total amount of the submitted bid price. The director may, by insertion of a contract provision, reduce the fifty per cent amount.

Bidders without any prior work experience with the department shall be granted a multiplying factor of eight in order to establish a dollar bidding capacity on their certificates. In the event a bidder bids with the department as a prime contractor or is selected to perform work as a subcontractor, all pending work of the bidder will be assessed against the dollar amount set out in its certificate.

Supplemental Information

Authorized By: 119.03, 5525.05
Amplifies: 5525.01, 5525.02, 5525.03, 5525.04, 5525.05, 5525.06, 5525.07, 5525.08, 5525.09
Five Year Review Date: 2/5/2026
Rule 5501:2-3-08 | Subcontracting procedure.
 

(A) All subcontractors shall obtain a certificate of qualification as required by section 5525.06 of the Revised Code, except for the following:

(1) Subcontractors who will perform less than one million dollars of subcontractor work on construction projects let by the department in a calendar year and who obtain approval from the director to perform the subcontractor work; or

(2) Subcontractors working on a project that does not contain any work types.

(B) Prime contractors may employ, with the director's permission, subcontractors who do not have a certificate of qualification to perform work on a per project basis collectively totaling no greater than twenty percent of the amount bid but not to exceed five million dollars per project. The individual subcontractor yearly limitation set out in paragraph (A)(1) of this rule shall not be exceeded.

(C) Subcontractors who hold a certificate of qualification must have sufficient work types necessary in order to be granted permission to perform the requested subcontract work.

(D) No portion of any contract shall be sublet, assigned or otherwise disposed of by any certificate holder or by any subcontractor including the work proposed to be sublet to a subcontractor who does not hold a certificate of qualification, without the prior written permission of the director, but such permission shall not relieve the contractor of the responsibility for the management and performance of its contract with the department.

(E) Each request by a certificate holder to sublet work must be in writing, including the work proposed to be sublet to a subcontractor who does not hold a certificate of qualification, and when requested be accompanied by a sworn statement of the proposed subcontractor setting forth all of its uncompleted contracts with all owners and uncompleted subcontracts with all contractors.

(F) In the event that the subcontractor provides performance and payment bonds for the amount of the sublet work for which the director has granted permission, the director then shall increase the dollar bidding capacity of the prime contractor by the amount of the performance bond.

(G) The calculation used to determine compliance with paragraph (A)(1) of this rule shall exclude up to one million dollars of subcontractor work performed in a calendar year by any subcontractor on the Brent Spence bridge corridor construction project.

(H) Notwithstanding paragraph (B) of this rule, for the Brent Spence bridge corridor construction project, the design-build team may employ, with the director's permission, subcontractors who do not have a certificate of qualification to perform work totaling no greater than ten percent of the total value of the guaranteed maximum price of the project.

Last updated May 1, 2023 at 8:46 AM

Supplemental Information

Authorized By: 5525.05
Amplifies: 5525.01, 5525.02, 5525.03, 5525.04, 5525.05, 5525.06, 5525.07, 5525.08, 5525.09
Five Year Review Date: 2/5/2026
Prior Effective Dates: 11/1/2006, 2/15/2021
Rule 5501:2-3-10 | Revocation and debarment.
 

In accordance with section 5525.03 of the Revised Code, the director may refuse to issue a certificate of qualification, may revoke a certificate of qualification, or debar a certificate holder when the applicant or certificate holder has been found to be responsible for any one of the following:

(A) The company has been defaulted by the director on a department project;

(B) The company or its principals, including its key personnel, have been debarred or suspended by the United States government or other states or other Ohio state agencies from bidding on or working on their projects;

(C) The company or its principals, including its key personnel, have been convicted of crimes involving fraud that includes but is not limited to bribery, falsification of documents, theft and any offense that directly reflects on the integrity of the business;

(D) The company files for protection from its creditors in the United States bankruptcy court;

(E) The company or its principals, including its key personnel, deliberately submitted false or misleading information in connection with the application for a certificate of qualification or in connection with a bid for a contract or in connection with the performance of a contract;

(F) The company or its principals, including its key personnel, have been found to have colluded with other bidders for purposes of obtaining or dividing contracts;

(G) The company or its principals, including its key personnel, have been found to have violated its disadvantaged or minority prime contract or subcontract requirements;

(H) The company or its principals, including its key personnel, have failed to pay prevailing wages, fringes and benefits to its employees;

(I) The company has received a multiplier computed in accordance with rule 5501:2-3-03 of the Administrative Code of less than 5.0 for two consecutive years when contractor evaluations have been performed.

At the time of denial of a certification or revocation of a certification, the director shall provide written notice to the applicant or certificate holder of the grounds for denial or revocation of a certification. Said grounds shall be consistent with paragraphs (A) to (H) of this rule.

The applicant or certificate holder may appeal the determination of the denial to the prequalification review board by following the appeal process under rule 5501:2-3-09 of the Administrative Code. The director may refuse to allow an applicant or certificate holder the opportunity to bid on a construction project during the pendency of the appeal.

Prior to a debarment action, the director shall provide written notice to the applicant or certificate holder of the grounds for debarment and afford the applicant or certificate holder an opportunity for a hearing before a hearing officer selected by the director.

If the applicant or certificate holder desires a hearing then the applicant or certificate holder must request the hearing in writing within thirty days of the mailing of the notice for debarment.

The request for the hearing must be sent to the director with a copy to the administrator of the office of contracts. The director shall schedule the hearing within fifteen days of receiving the request for a hearing. The hearing date may be continued by the director at his request or the request of the applicant or certificate holder.

In the event an appeal is requested, the hearing officer will provide a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to present its evidence as to why its certificate should be issued or reinstated and the company or its individuals not be debarred. The hearing shall be an opportunity for the hearing officer to determine de novo whether the appellant should hold a certificate of qualification. The hearing officer may receive from the appellant and from the department documents and other evidence he rules to be relevant to the proceedings. A stenographic transcript of the oral testimony shall be made.

The appellant and the department may be represented by counsel, however, such representation is not required. Any subpoenas for the hearing shall be requested from the hearing officer for issuance by the department.

The hearing officer shall, within seven days of the completion of the hearing, submit a written report to the director setting forth his findings of fact and conclusions of law. The report shall include a recommendation of action to be taken by the director. A copy of this written report shall, at the time it is submitted to the director, be forwarded by certified mail to the appellant, or its representative of record, and to the department. Both the appellant and the department may file with the director written objections to the hearing officer's report within ten days of receipt of the report. A copy of these objections shall be sent to the opposing party by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the same time they are sent to the director. The opposing party may submit to the director a written response to the objections within seven days of receipt of the objections. The director may refer the matter back to the hearing officer for consideration of the objections and responses. The hearing officer shall consider these objections and submit a supplementary report and recommendation to the director within five days after such a referral. The director shall not take any action approving, modifying, or rejecting the recommendation of the hearing officer or otherwise determine the eligibility of the appellant until after the applicable time periods provided in this paragraph unless it is modified by agreement of the applicant and the department.

The director will render a decision within fourteen days after the expiration of the time for submission from the appellant, the department and the hearing officer. The decision shall be sent by certified mail to the appellant or its representative of record.

The appellant of a debarment may appeal an adverse determination by the director as provided for in section 5525.03 of the Revised Code.

The record will be preserved and maintained in the custody of the director following the decision of the director. Copies of the record will be made available at cost.

Supplemental Information

Authorized By: 119.03, 5525.05
Amplifies: 5525.01, 5525.02, 5525.03, 5525.04, 5525.05, 5525.06, 5525.07, 5525.08, 5525.09
Five Year Review Date: 2/5/2026