(A) Beginning with the 2024-2025 school
year, and annually thereafter, the report card will include an overall rating
and a rating for each of the gap closing, achievement, progress, graduation,
early literacy, and college, career, workforce, and military readiness
components.
(B) The overall rating will be calculated
using the gap closing, achievement, progress, graduation early literacy, and
college, career, workforce, and military readiness components. In cases where a
school district or school has ratings for all six components, each component
shall be weighted in accordance with division (D)(3)(g)(ii) of section 3302.03
of the Revised Code such that:
(1) The achievement
component shall contribute twenty-five per cent towards the overall
rating;
(2) The progress
component shall contribute twenty-five per cent towards the overall
rating.
(3) The graduation
component shall contribute 12.5 per cent towards the overall
rating.
(4) The gap closing
component shall contribute 12.5 per cent towards the overall
rating.
(5) The early literacy
component shall contribute 12.5 per cent towards the overall
rating.
Where a school or district does not have all
six components, the applicable components will be weighted in accordance with
the proportional adjustment of component weighting chart in appendix A to this
rule.
(6) The college, career,
workforce, and military readiness component shall contribute 12.5 per cent
towards the overall rating.
(C) To calculate the overall performance
rating, the cut scores of each applicable component will be converted to points
in accordance with the conversion charts in appendix A to this rule. A school
district or school will be assigned an overall performance rating according to
the following performance benchmarks:
(1) A rating of five
stars for a score of equal to or greater than 4.125 points;
(2) A rating of four and
one-half stars for a score equal to or greater than 3.625 points but less than
4.125 points;
(3) A rating of four
stars for a score equal to or greater than 3.125 points but less than 3.625
points;
(4) A rating of three and
one-half stars for a score equal to or greater than 2.625 points but less than
3.125 points;
(5) A rating of three
stars for a score equal to or greater than 2.125 points but less than 2.625
points;
(6) A rating of two and
one-half stars for a score equal to or greater than 1.625 points but less than
2.125 points;
(7) A rating of two stars
for a score equal to or greater than 1.125 points but less than 1.625
points;
(8) A rating of one and
one-half stars for a score equal to or greater than 0.563 points but less than
1.125 points; and
(9) A rating of one star
for a score less than 0.563 points.
(D) In cases where a school district or
school has ratings for fewer than six components, the non-rated components
shall not be included in the calculation and the percentages for the remaining
rated components defined in paragraphs (B)(1) to (B)(6) of this rule shall be
adjusted to maintain the same proportional weight within the
calculation.
(E)
(1) Performance ratings for the
achievement component will be assigned according to the following
benchmarks:
(a) Five stars for a percentage of the maximum performance index
score of greater than or equal to ninety per cent;
(b) Four stars for a percentage of the maximum performance index
score greater than or equal to eighty per cent but less than ninety per
cent;
(c) Three stars for a percentage of the maximum performance index
score greater than or equal to seventy per cent but less than eighty per
cent;
(d) Two stars for a percentage of the maximum performance index
score greater than or equal to fifty per cent but less than seventy per
cent;
(e) One star for a percentage of the maximum performance index
score less than fifty per cent.
(2) The performance ratings for the
achievement component will be described on the report card as
follows:
(a) A five-star rating will be described as "significantly
exceeds state standards in academic achievement";
(b) A four-star rating will be described as "exceeds state
standards in academic achievement";
(c) A three-star rating will be described as "meets state
standards in academic achievement";
(d) A two-star rating will be described as "needs support
to meet state standards in academic achievement";
(e) A one-star rating will be described as "needs
significant support to meet state standards in academic
achievement."
(F)
(1) Performance ratings for the progress
component will be assigned according to the following benchmarks for
districts:
(a) Five stars for a growth index of at least 2 and effect size
of at least 0.1;
(b) Four stars for a growth index of at least 2 and effect size
of less than 0.1;
(c) Three stars for a growth index greater than or equal to -2
but less than 2;
(d) Two stars for a growth index of less than -2 and effect size
of at least -0.1;
(e) One star for a growth index less than -2 and effect size of
less than -0.1.
(2) Performance ratings for the progress
component will be assigned according to the following benchmarks for
schools:
(a) Five stars for a growth index of at least 2 and effect size
of at least 0.2;
(b) Four stars for a growth index of at least 2 and effect size
of less than 0.2;
(c) Three stars for a growth index greater than or equal to -2
but less than 2;
(d) Two stars for a growth index of less than -2 and effect size
of at least -0.2;
(e) One star for a growth index less than -2 and effect size of
less than -0.2.
(3) The performance ratings for the
progress component will be described for school districts on the report card as
follows:
(a) A five-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence that the district exceeded student growth expectations by a larger
magnitude";
(b) A four-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence that the district exceeded student growth
expectations";
(c) A three-star rating will be described as "evidence that
the district met student growth expectations";
(d) A two-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence that the district fell short of student growth
expectations";
(e) A one-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence that the district fell short of student growth expectations by a
larger magnitude."
(4) The performance ratings for the
progress component will be described for schools on the report card as
follows:
(a) A five-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence that the school exceeded student growth expectations by a larger
magnitude";
(b) A four-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence that the school exceeded student growth
expectations";
(c) A three-star rating will be described as "evidence that
the school met student growth expectations";
(d) A two-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence that the school fell short of student growth
expectations";
(e) A one-star rating will be described as "significant
evidence the school fell short of student growth expectations by a larger
magnitude."
(G)
(1) Performance ratings for the gap
closing component will be assigned according to the following
benchmarks:
(a) Five stars for a percentage greater than or equal to sixty
per cent of applicable points earned;
(b) Four stars for a percentage greater than or equal to
forty-five per cent but less than sixty per cent of applicable points
earned;
(c) Three stars for a percentage greater than or equal to thirty
per cent but less than forty-five per cent of applicable points
earned;
(d) Two stars for a percentage greater than or equal to ten per
cent but less than thirty per cent of applicable points earned;
(e) One star for a percentage less than ten per cent of
applicable points earned.
(2) The performance ratings for the gap
closing component will be described on the report card as follows:
(a) A five-star rating will be described as "significantly
exceeds state standards in closing educational gaps";
(b) A four-star rating will be described as "exceeds state
standards in closing educational gaps";
(c) A three-star rating will be described as "meets state
standards in closing educational gaps";
(d) A two-star rating will be described as "needs support
to meet state standards in closing educational gaps";
(e) A one-star rating will be described as "needs
significant support to meet state standards in closing educational
gaps."
(H)
(1) The performance on each measure under
paragraphs (H)(3), (H)(4), and (H)(5) of this rule are multiplied by the weight
as described in division (D)(3)(e) of section 3302.03 of the Revised Code to
create a combined component percentage. Performance ratings for the early
literacy component will be assigned according to the following benchmarks based
on the combined component percentage:
(a) Five stars for a percentage of greater than or equal to
eighty-eight per cent;
(b) Four stars for a percentage of greater than or equal to
seventy-eight per cent but less than eighty-eight per cent;
(c) Three stars for a percentage of greater than or equal to
sixty-eight per cent but less than seventy-eight per cent;
(d) Two stars for a percentage of greater than or equal to
fifty-eight per cent but less than sixty-eight per cent;
(e) One star for a percentage of less than fifty-eight per
cent.
(2) The performance ratings for the early
literacy component will be described on the report card as
follows:
(a) A five-star rating will be described as "significantly
exceeds state standards in early literacy (K-3)";
(b) A four-star rating will be described as "exceeds state
standards in early literacy (K-3)";
(c) A three-star rating will be described as "meets state
standards in early literacy (K-3)";
(d) A two-star rating will be described as "needs support
to meet state standards in early literacy (K-3)";
(e) A one-star rating will be described as "needs
significant support to meet state standards in early literacy
(K-3)."
(3) The measure for proficiency in third
grade reading will be a percentage of students in the district or school who
score proficient or higher on the reading segment of the third grade English
language arts assessment.
(4) The measure for progress in improving
literacy in grades kindergarten through three will be a reduction in the total
percentage of students scoring below grade level, or below proficient, compared
from year to year on the reading segments of the diagnostics and assessments
listed in division (D)(1)(h) of section 3302.03 of the Revised
Code.
(5) The measure for promotion to the
fourth grade will be a percentage of students in the district or school who are
promoted to the fourth grade and not subject to retention under section
3313.608 of the Revised Code.
(6) For the purpose of calculating a
rating for the early learning component, the performance measures under
paragraphs (H)(3), (H)(4), and (H)(5) of this rule will be weighted according
to the provisions of division (D)(3)(e) of section 3302.03 of the Revised
Code.
(I)
(1) Performance ratings for the
graduation component will be assigned according to the following
benchmarks:
(a) Five stars for a weighted percentage of students graduating
in four or five years of greater than or equal to 96.5 per cent;
(b) Four stars for a weighted percentage of students graduating
in four or five years of greater than or equal to 93.5 per cent but less than
96.5 per cent;
(c) Three stars for a weighted percentage of students graduating
in four or five years of greater than or equal to 90.0 per cent but less than
93.5 per cent;
(d) Two stars for a weighted percentage of students graduating in
four or five years of greater than or equal to 84.0 per cent but less than 90.0
per cent;
(e) One star for a weighted percentage of students graduating in
four or five years of less than 84.0 per cent.
(2) The performance ratings for the
graduation component will be described on the report card as
follows:
(a) A five-star rating will be described as "significantly
exceeds state standards in graduation rates";
(b) A four-star rating will be described as "exceeding
state standards in graduation rates";
(c) A three-star rating will be described as "meets state
standards in graduation rates";
(d) A two-star rating will be described as "needs support
to meet state standards in graduation rates";
(e) A one-star rating will be described as "needs
significant support to meet state standards in graduation
rates."
(J)
(1) Performance ratings
for the college, career, workforce, and military readiness component will be
assigned according to the following benchmarks:
(a) Five stars for a percentage greater than or equal to
eighty-five per cent;
(b) Four stars for a percentage greater than or equal to
seventy-five per cent but less than eighty-five per cent;
(c) Three stars for a percentage greater than or equal to
sixty-three per cent but less than seventy-five per cent;
(d) Two stars for a percentage greater than or equal to
fifty-three per cent but less than sixty-three per cent;
(e) One star for a percentage less than fifty-three per
cent;
(2) The performance
ratings for the college, career, workforce, and military readiness component
will be described on the report card as follows:
(a) A five-star rating will be described as
"significantly exceeds state standards in post-secondary
readiness";
(b) A four-star rating will be described as
"exceeding state standards in post-secondary
readiness";
(c) A three-star rating will be described as "meets
state standards in post-secondary readiness";
(d) A two-star rating will be described as "needs
support to meet state standards in post-secondary
readiness";
(e) A one-star rating will be described as "needs
significant support to meet state standards in post-secondary
readiness."
(3) A district or
building will not receive lower than a performance rating of three stars for
the component if the district's or building's performance on the
component meets or exceeds a level of improvement of fifteen per cent from the
prior year.
(K)
(1) All mathematical
calculations required to determine the final percentages used to assign the
ratings described in paragraphs (E), (F), (G), (H) and (I) of this rule will be
performed using unrounded numbers. Once each calculation is complete, the final
percentages will be rounded to the nearest tenth using standard rounding rules
(half rounds up) for the purpose of assigning each component rating. The
weighted points generated from the calculations described in paragraph (B) of
this rule will be rounded to the nearest thousandth for the purpose of
assigning the overall rating.
(2) When displaying data
on the report card, the department of education and workforce may round or
truncate the numbers and percentages as needed to make it easier for readers to
view and understand the information, but the original numbers will still be
used for any calculations as described in paragraph (K)(1) of this
rule.