Ohio Revised Code Search
Section |
---|
Section 2307.711 | Assumption of risk as affirmative defense to product liability claim.
...(A) Subject to divisions (B)(1), (2), and (3) of this section, sections 2315.32 to 2315.36 of the Revised Code apply to a product liability claim that is asserted pursuant to sections 2307.71 to 2307.80 of the Revised Code. (B)(1) Express or implied assumption of the risk may be asserted as an affirmative defense to a product liability claim under sections 2307.71 to 2307.80 of the Revised Code, except that express ... |
Section 2307.72 | Civil action for product liability claim.
...y damages for injury, death, or loss to person or property, or to relief in the form of the abatement of a nuisance, civil penalties, cleanup costs, cost recovery, an injunction or temporary restraining order, or restitution, that arises, in whole or in part, from contamination or pollution of the environment or a threat of contamination or pollution of the environment, including contamination or pollution or a threa... |
Section 2307.73 | Liability of manufacturer - enterprise liability rejected.
...(A) A manufacturer is subject to liability for compensatory damages based on a product liability claim only if the claimant establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, all of the following: (1) Subject to division (B) of this section, the manufacturer's product in question was defective in manufacture or construction as described in section 2307.74 of the Revised Code, was defective in design or formula... |
Section 2307.74 | Product defective in manufacture or construction.
...A product is defective in manufacture or construction if, when it left the control of its manufacturer, it deviated in a material way from the design specifications, formula, or performance standards of the manufacturer, or from otherwise identical units manufactured to the same design specifications, formula, or performance standards. A product may be defective in manufacture or construction as described in this sec... |
Section 2307.75 | Product defective in design or formulation.
...and which is recognized by the ordinary person with the ordinary knowledge common to the community. (F) A product is not defective in design or formulation if, at the time the product left the control of its manufacturer, a practical and technically feasible alternative design or formulation was not available that would have prevented the harm for which the claimant seeks to recover compensatory damages withou... |
Section 2307.76 | Product defective due to inadequate warning or instruction.
...e physician or other legally authorized person who prescribes or dispenses that ethical drug for a claimant in question and if the federal food and drug administration has not provided that warning or instruction relative to that ethical drug is to be given directly to the ultimate user of it. |
Section 2307.77 | Product conforming to representation made by manufacturer.
...A product is defective if it did not conform, when it left the control of its manufacturer, to a representation made by that manufacturer. A product may be defective because it did not conform to a representation even though its manufacturer did not act fraudulently, recklessly, or negligently in making the representation. |
Section 2307.78 | Liability of supplier.
...(A) Subject to division (B) of this section, a supplier is subject to liability for compensatory damages based on a product liability claim only if the claimant establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that either of the following applies: (1) The supplier in question was negligent and that, negligence was a proximate cause of harm for which the claimant seeks to recover compensatory damages; (2) Th... |
Section 2307.79 | Compensatory damages for economic loss from manufacturer or supplier.
...(A) If a claimant is entitled to recover compensatory damages for harm from a manufacturer in accordance with section 2307.73 of the Revised Code or from a supplier in accordance with division (B) of section 2307.78 of the Revised Code, the claimant may recover from the manufacturer or supplier in question, in that action, compensatory damages for any economic loss that proximately resulted from the defective aspect ... |
Section 2307.80 | Punitive or exemplary damages from manufacturer or supplier.
...ther the trier of fact is a jury or the court, if the trier of fact determines that a manufacturer or supplier in question is liable for punitive or exemplary damages in connection with a product liability claim, the amount of those damages shall be determined by the court. In determining the amount of punitive or exemplary damages, the court shall consider factors including, but not limited to, the following: (1) T... |
Section 2307.81 | Dissemination of false information about the safety of Ohio's food supply.
... for damages and for any other relief a court having jurisdiction considers appropriate. If the plaintiff establishes that the disseminator knew or should have known that the information was false, damages may be awarded, including compensatory and punitive damages, reasonable attorney's fees, and costs of the action. (D) In any action maintained under division (C) of this section by an association representing prod... |
Section 2307.84 | Silicosis or mixed dust disease claims - definitions.
...ludes a product liability claim that is subject to sections 2307.71 to 2307.80 of the Revised Code. "Tort action" does not include a civil action for damages for a breach of contract or another agreement between persons. (FF) "Veterans' benefit program" means any program for benefits in connection with military service administered by the veterans' administration under title 38 of the United States Code. (GG) "Work... |
Section 2307.85 | Silicosis claim - prima facie showing - evidence of physical impairment - effect of decision.
... (F) All of the following apply to the court's decision on the prima-facie showing that meets the requirements of division (B), (C), or (D) of this section: (1) The court's decision does not result in any presumption at trial that the exposed person has a physical impairment that is caused by a silica-related condition. (2) The court's decision is not conclusive as to the liability of any defendant in the case. (... |
Section 2307.86 | Mixed dust disease claim - prima facie showing - evidence of physical impairment - effect of decision.
... (F) All of the following apply to the court's decision on the prima-facie showing that meets the requirements of division (B), (C), or (D) of this section: (1) The court's decision does not result in any presumption at trial that the exposed person has a physical impairment that is caused by a mixed dust-related condition. (2) The court's decision is not conclusive as to the liability of any defendant in the case... |
Section 2307.87 | Silicosis or mixed dust disease claim - filing of evidence of physical impairment - challenge - administrative dismissal.
...ed in division (A) of this section, the court shall determine from all of the evidence submitted whether the proffered prima-facie evidence meets the minimum requirements specified in division (B), (C), or (D) of section 2307.85 or division (B), (C), or (D) of section 2307.86 of the Revised Code, whichever is applicable. The court shall resolve the issue of whether the plaintiff has made the prima-facie showing requi... |
Section 2307.88 | Silicosis or mixed dust disease claim - tolling of statute of limitations - nonmalignant and cancer claims distinct.
...hall not begin to run until the exposed person discovers, or through the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, that the person has a physical impairment due to a nonmalignant condition. A silicosis claim or a mixed dust disease claim based upon a nonmalignant condition that is filed before the cause of action pursuant to this division arises is preserved for purposes of the period of limitations. ... |
Section 2307.89 | Silicosis or mixed dust disease claim against premises owner.
...vidual is required to perform the work personally. (e) The individual is hired, supervised, or paid by the other contracting party. (f) A continuing relationship exists between the individual and the other contracting party that contemplates continuing or recurring work even if the work is not full time. (g) The individual's hours of work are established by the other contracting party. (h) The individual is ... |
Section 2307.90 | Silicosis or mixed dust disease claim - operation of other laws unaffected - exhumation not required.
...eedings; (2) Affect the ability of any person who is able to make a showing that the person satisfies the claim criteria for compensable claims or demands under a trust established pursuant to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Chapter 11, to make a claim or demand against that trust. (B) Sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of the Revised Code shall not affect the scop... |
Section 2307.901 | Silicosis or mixed dust disease claim - multiple defendants - substantial factor test.
...rt action alleges any injury or loss to person resulting from exposure to silica or mixed dust as a result of the tortious act of one or more defendants, in order to maintain a cause of action against any of those defendants based on that injury or loss, the plaintiff must prove that the conduct of that particular defendant was a substantial factor in causing the injury or loss on which the cause of action is based. ... |
Section 2307.902 | Silicosis or mixed dust disease claim - piercing the corporate veil.
...division (A)(2) of this section. (B) A court shall not find that the holder exerted such control over the covered entity that the covered entity did not have a separate mind, will, or existence of its own or to have caused the covered entity to be used for the purpose of perpetrating a fraud solely as a result of any of the following actions, events, or relationships: (1) The holder is an affiliate of the covered e... |
Section 2307.91 | Asbestos claims - definitions.
...of a civil nature in a state or federal court, whether cognizable as cases at law or in equity or admiralty. "Civil action" does not include any of the following: (1) A civil action relating to any workers' compensation law; (2) A civil action alleging any claim or demand made against a trust established pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 524(g); (3) A civil action alleging any claim or demand made against a trust esta... |
Section 2307.92 | Asbestos claim - prima facie showing - evidence of physical impairment - effect of decision.
...sion (D)(1)(c) of this section. (3) No court shall require or permit the exhumation of a decedent for the purpose of obtaining evidence to make, or to oppose, a prima-facie showing required under division (D)(1) or (2) of this section regarding a tort action of the type described in that division. (E) No prima-facie showing is required in a tort action alleging an asbestos claim based upon mesothelioma. (F) Eviden... |
Section 2307.93 | Asbestos claim - filing of evidence of physical impairment - challenge - administrative dismissal.
...on motion and for good cause shown, the court may extend the one hundred twenty-day period described in this division. (3)(a) For any cause of action that arises before the effective date of this section, the provisions set forth in divisions (B), (C), and (D) of section 2307.92 of the Revised Code are to be applied unless the court that has jurisdiction over the case finds both of the following: (i) A substantive ... |
Section 2307.931 | Asbestos claim - plaintiff to file specified disclosures.
...ection, on a motion by a defendant, the court shall dismiss the plaintiff's asbestos claim without prejudice if the defendant's asbestos-containing product or site is not identified in the disclosures required under division (A) of this section or the plaintiff fails to comply with division (A) of this section. (E) The court may not dismiss a plaintiff's claim under division (D) of this section upon a showing of go... |
Section 2307.94 | Asbestos claim - tolling of statute of limitations - nonmalignant and cancer claims distinct.
...hall not begin to run until the exposed person has a cause of action for bodily injury pursuant to section 2305.10 of the Revised Code. An asbestos claim based upon a nonmalignant condition that is filed before the cause of action for bodily injury pursuant to that section arises is preserved for purposes of the period of limitations. (B) An asbestos claim that arises out of a nonmalignant condition shall be a disti... |